Anim8or Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Ian Ross has just released a book on Anim8or. It's perect for a beginner and a good reference for experienced users. It contains detailed chapters on every aspect, with many examples. Get your own copy here: "Anim8or Tutorial Book"

Author Topic: Hmm, how did Anim8or go from 1129 to 1127.  (Read 7257 times)

lppena

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 299
  • Anim8or, does a body good.
    • View Profile
    • Truespace Anim8or Casual Modeling Forum.
Hmm, how did Anim8or go from 1129 to 1127.
« on: November 16, 2014, 09:26:41 am »
Was there an issue with 1129 or am I missing something? Love the software but I guess I'm getting lost with all the new releases.
Logged

MvGulik

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
  • [... Lost in Space ...]
    • View Profile
Re: Hmm, how did Anim8or go from 1129 to 1127.
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2014, 09:42:45 am »
Logged

Raxx

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1482
    • View Profile
Re: Hmm, how did Anim8or go from 1129 to 1127.
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2014, 10:57:31 am »
1129 occurred after 1127, and was just a minor fix, which us why it wasn't posted in the development release topic just yet. If it's getting confusing, you can just wait for the ones posted in the development release thread, or wait for the next official stable release.
Logged

lppena

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 299
  • Anim8or, does a body good.
    • View Profile
    • Truespace Anim8or Casual Modeling Forum.
Re: Hmm, how did Anim8or go from 1129 to 1127.
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2014, 03:44:34 am »
Quote from: Raxx on November 16, 2014, 10:57:31 am
1129 occurred after 1127, and was just a minor fix, which us why it wasn't posted in the development release topic just yet. If it's getting confusing, you can just wait for the ones posted in the development release thread, or wait for the next official stable release.

Thanks. I thought that's what I did originally hence the confusion.
Logged